Maybe a little wonky, but I needed a way to run unit tests
on AArch64, and this was the best way of running unit tests
on Android that I could come up with.
In 8c723d0, I intended to update the main activity, emulation
activity and game properties dialog, but I forgot to actually
update the game properties dialog. This commit fixes that.
The changes outside of GamePropertiesDialog.java are just
to hide the Wii controller settings for GameCube games.
Basically, instead of having one button for config, one button
for graphics settings and so on, we now have just one settings
button which takes you to a screen where you pick between
config/graphics/GameCube controllers/Wii Remotes.
The main reason I want to do this is because people still have
trouble finding Overlay Controls in the "new" in-game menu.
Typically (depending on the screen size and the length of the
game name), the scrollable part of the menu can fit 4 items,
and merging Config and Graphics Settings into one item would
move Overlay Controls from 5th place to 4th place (assuming the
user doesn't have savestates enabled), which makes it findable
even for users who don't realize the menu can be scrolled.
The dialog that's shown when long pressing a game in the game
list is also shortened. While not a pressing matter, I think
it was getting a bit long.
An additional reason to do this is because we probably will
want to make it possible to edit the controller settings
from the in-game menu at some point in the future. With the
old approach, this would require us to dedicate a whopping 4
menu items just for settings (not including Overlay Controls),
which I think is excessive.
This enables patches for game-breaking problems by default.
My criterion for which patches to select was that the patch
has to make the game's behavior closer to how the game acts
on console. So workarounds for Dolphin not emulating caches
accurately are enabled by default, but not things like
Twilight Princess's minimap speedhack or patches for
disabling memory card checks in Pokémon games.
If we want to enable codes in the default game INIs,
we should have some way for users to disable them.
This commit accomplishes that by adding a *_Disabled
section corresponding to each *_Enabled section.
In order to reach the middle guard (at m_stack_base + GUARD_OFFSET)
before the bottom guard (at m_stack_base), the stack pointer
must start at an address which is higher than the middle guard.
It also didn't make sense that we were allocating memory
and then not using the top part of it.
Fixes https://bugs.dolphin-emu.org/issues/12327.
When we started using fmt in CheckExternalExceptions, JitArm64
mysteriously stopped working even though the code path where
fmt was used never was reached. This is because the compiler
added a function prologue and epilogue to set up the stack,
since the code path that used fmt required the use of the stack.
However, the breakage didn't actually have anything to do
with the usage of the stack in itself, but rather with the
compiler's insertion of a stack canary. In the function
epilogue, a cmp instruction was inserted to check that the
stack canary had not been overwritten during the execution
of the function. This cmp instruction overwriting the status
flags ended up having a disastrous side effect once execution
returned to code emitted by JitArm64::WriteExceptionExit.
JitArm64's dispatcher contains a branch to the "do_timing"
code which is intended to be taken if the PPC downcount is
negative. However, the dispatcher doesn't update the status
flags on its own before this conditional branch, but rather
expects the calling code to have set them as a side effect
of DoDownCount. The root cause of our bug was that
JitArm64::WriteExceptionExit was calling DoDownCount before
Check(External)Exceptions instead of after.
1. Comparing string_views does not behave the same as strncmp
in the case where SConfig's game ID is longer than 6 chars.
2. DTMHeader::GetGameID wasn't excluding null bytes for game IDs
shorter than 6 chars.
3. == was accidentally used instead of !=.
This issue is both severe and surprisingly difficult to find
the root cause of, so I think it would make sense to add a simple
hotfix for now. https://bugs.dolphin-emu.org/issues/12327
The way Config::Get works in master, it first calls
Config::GetActiveLayerForConfig which searches for the
setting in all layers, and then calls Config::Layer::Get
which searches for the same setting again within the given
layer. We can remove this second search by combining the
logic of Config::GetActiveLayerForConfig and
Config::Layer::Get into one function.
We want to use positional arguments in translatable strings
that have more than one argument so that translators can change
the order of them, but the question is: Should we also use
positional arguments in translatable strings with only one
argument? I think it makes most sense that way, partially
so that translators don't even have to be aware of the
non-positional syntax and partially because "translatable
strings use positional arguments" is an easier rule for us
to remember than "transitional strings which have more than
one argument use positional arguments". But let me know if
you have a different opinion.
tr calls with more than one argument would have a 0x04 byte
in the returned string when no translation was found
(which always is the case when using Dolphin in English).
They are unused, since there is no C++ code that touches
these settings. See the discussion in PR 9152, which is
a PR that adds a lot more Android-specific settings.
I moved it from the main settings screen to the in-game menu
in PR 8439 so that it could be changed while a game is running,
but now that the main settings can be accessed while a game is
running, there's no reason to not put it in the main settings.
https://bugs.dolphin-emu.org/issues/12067
This is already handled by SurfaceDestroyed. In the worst case,
the extra code could even race with SurfaceDestroyed if they
are triggered at the same time, but this is highly improbable.
Time for yet another new iteration of working around the
"surface destruction during boot" problem...
This time, the strategy is to use a mutex in MainAndroid.cpp.